THEME BY SARAHCATHS+
mergernchern
J+KDramas Movies Anime&Manga TV Books
Megan / 19 / Female. This blog is just a big mess. Tags are employed whenever I can remember to put them there, so sorry everything's not properly organized. Check out any of my links to see what I currently watch and read and what's in the future! Feel free to also use it to recommend things! You should also check out Ellie's blog, she's an awesome best friend from real life. My ask box is always open for any and all questions so feel free to drop by whenever you please! Also, I cosplay! So feel free to suggest characters for me to cosplay as and have a look at my cosplay list!

I need to follow more blogs that post anime gifs/talk about anime/have anime. Just reblog or like this and I’ll take a look at your blog!

via source reblog posted 36 minutes ago with 123,064 notes →

shouldnt:

We’ve officially reached that annoying time of year where it’s sweater weather in the morning, but by midday you die from a heatstroke.

via source reblog posted 37 minutes ago with 134,413 notes →
percychekov:

yuki-menoko:

gloomandhowitgetsthatway:

k17l53:

sugar-soul:



Thanks satan.

What the fuck man

This post goes around on this site and everytime I see it, as a Theologist in making it annoys me to see these “militiant atheists” (or fedoraists, to seperate the good ones from the bad ones, cause I love you guys) who tries to falsely accuse the Holy Scriptures with things that are never said in either of the scriptures. "That women are to be sold if they were raped" in the Bible or "That women must sexually submit to men" in the Qu’ran. Ofcourse, I’m not trying to prove Satanism wrong, I don’t really care what people believe in, but I’m here to correct the misinterpretations by Tumblr’s gullible community as a way to educate, because it might actually interest you to know some real facts about what the Abrahamic religions says on the matter:
First of all - YOU ALL KNOW THAT ADULTERY IS PROHIBITED IN EITHER SCRIPTURES, YET YOU TRY TO TURN THOSE VERSES UPSIDE DOWN FOR YOUR OWN PLEASURE. [17:32, 25:68-70, Quran] [Exodus 20:14 Proverbs 6:32 Hebrew 13:4]
Second - There are no verses that said so, never has that been said.
Third - Noone sells women when they’ve been violated, who even does that today?
Fourth - Do you guys actually read the scriptures AT ALL???
Fifth - There’s one verse in Deuteronomy that claims that a Man should marry and stay with the woman if she’d been violated by him and pay her 50 shekels. [Deuteronomy 22:29]1. Christians do not follow the Torah/Old Testament anymore, they follow the New Testament. It’s called the New Covenant, and Jesus never claimed anything about selling women in the Gospels.2. The rapist is required to marry his victim, and is not permitted to divorce her without her consent. The Talmud explains that this obligation rests on the rapist,  NOT THE VICTIM. She is under no obligation to marry him.  ”He must pay fifty shekels to compensate her for the lack of gifts, and is also forced to marry her, should she desire it” says Bible commentator and philosopher Rabbi Isaac Abarbanel, so you won’t bash Judaism for that either.[Talmud, Ketubot 49b]
Fifth - FOR THE LAST TIME, USE SOURCES FOR THE VERSES THAT SAYS SO
Sixth - Rape is strictly forbidden in either scriptures and can result in a mild case of THE DEADNESS - not only is it Adultery, but in Islam, Christianity as well as Judaism it’s an act of terror against an individual and society.
That post has over 100,000 notes, can you believe that at least 50,000 people on this Shaytaan website fell for it and assumes that we all condone such acts? 

Thank you very much yuki-menoko, but I have one thing to add that you did not mention for the sake of protecting people’s right to practice
THE SATANIC BIBLE IN NO WAY ENCOURAGES PEOPLE TO CARE ABOUT THE NEEDS OR CONSENT OF OTHERS 
THE TEXT, WHICH IS A COLLABORATION OF OTHER PEOPLE’S WORDS AND NOT COLLABORATED ON OR BACKED UP BY DOCTRINE OR DISCUSSION IN THE SAME WAY AS THE BIBLE, THE QURAN, OR THE TORAH ARE, IS 100% FOCUSED ON SELF-CENTERED SELF-INDULGENCE, MOST OFTEN AT THE EXPENSE OF OTHERS 
THE TEXT TALKS ABOUT SEXUAL LIBERALISM SURE BUT IT ALSO TALKS ABOUT CONTROLLING PEOPLE AND KILLING PEOPLE AND BECOMING YOUR OWN PERSONAL GOD BECAUSE LIFE IS POINTLESS
SATANISTS ARE 100% ABOUT SELF-INDULGENCE AND NEVER GIVE A SHIT ABOUT OTHERS
THEY ARE THE MEN’S RIGHTS ACTIVISTS OF RELIGION
I AM A CHRISTIAN AND EVEN I KNOW THAT
WHY COULD LITERALLY NONE OF YOU TYPE THIS SHIT INTO GOOGLE 

percychekov:

yuki-menoko:

gloomandhowitgetsthatway:

k17l53:

sugar-soul:

image

Thanks satan.

What the fuck man

This post goes around on this site and everytime I see it, as a Theologist in making it annoys me to see these “militiant atheists” (or fedoraists, to seperate the good ones from the bad ones, cause I love you guys) who tries to falsely accuse the Holy Scriptures with things that are never said in either of the scriptures. "That women are to be sold if they were raped" in the Bible or "That women must sexually submit to men" in the Qu’ran. Ofcourse, I’m not trying to prove Satanism wrong, I don’t really care what people believe in, but I’m here to correct the misinterpretations by Tumblr’s gullible community as a way to educate, because it might actually interest you to know some real facts about what the Abrahamic religions says on the matter:

  • First of all - YOU ALL KNOW THAT ADULTERY IS PROHIBITED IN EITHER SCRIPTURES, YET YOU TRY TO TURN THOSE VERSES UPSIDE DOWN FOR YOUR OWN PLEASURE. 
    [17:32, 25:68-70, Quran] 
    [Exodus 20:14 Proverbs 6:32 Hebrew 13:4]

  • Second - There are no verses that said so, never has that been said.

  • Third - Noone sells women when they’ve been violated, who even does that today?

  • Fourth - Do you guys actually read the scriptures AT ALL???

  • Fifth - There’s one verse in Deuteronomy that claims that a Man should marry and stay with the woman if she’d been violated by him and pay her 50 shekels. [Deuteronomy 22:29]
    1. Christians do not follow the Torah/Old Testament anymore, they follow the New Testament. It’s called the New Covenant, and Jesus never claimed anything about selling women in the Gospels.
    2. The rapist is required to marry his victim, and is not permitted to divorce her without her consent. The Talmud explains that this obligation rests on the rapist,  NOT THE VICTIM. She is under no obligation to marry him.  ”He must pay fifty shekels to compensate her for the lack of gifts, and is also forced to marry her, should she desire it” says Bible commentator and philosopher Rabbi Isaac Abarbanel, so you won’t bash Judaism for that either.
    [Talmud, Ketubot 49b]
  • Fifth - FOR THE LAST TIME, USE SOURCES FOR THE VERSES THAT SAYS SO

  • Sixth - Rape is strictly forbidden in either scriptures and can result in a mild case of THE DEADNESS - not only is it Adultery, but in Islam, Christianity as well as Judaism it’s an act of terror against an individual and society.

That post has over 100,000 notes, can you believe that at least 50,000 people on this Shaytaan website fell for it and assumes that we all condone such acts? 

Thank you very much yuki-menoko, but I have one thing to add that you did not mention for the sake of protecting people’s right to practice

THE SATANIC BIBLE IN NO WAY ENCOURAGES PEOPLE TO CARE ABOUT THE NEEDS OR CONSENT OF OTHERS 

THE TEXT, WHICH IS A COLLABORATION OF OTHER PEOPLE’S WORDS AND NOT COLLABORATED ON OR BACKED UP BY DOCTRINE OR DISCUSSION IN THE SAME WAY AS THE BIBLE, THE QURAN, OR THE TORAH ARE, IS 100% FOCUSED ON SELF-CENTERED SELF-INDULGENCE, MOST OFTEN AT THE EXPENSE OF OTHERS 

THE TEXT TALKS ABOUT SEXUAL LIBERALISM SURE BUT IT ALSO TALKS ABOUT CONTROLLING PEOPLE AND KILLING PEOPLE AND BECOMING YOUR OWN PERSONAL GOD BECAUSE LIFE IS POINTLESS

SATANISTS ARE 100% ABOUT SELF-INDULGENCE AND NEVER GIVE A SHIT ABOUT OTHERS

THEY ARE THE MEN’S RIGHTS ACTIVISTS OF RELIGION

I AM A CHRISTIAN AND EVEN I KNOW THAT

WHY COULD LITERALLY NONE OF YOU TYPE THIS SHIT INTO GOOGLE 

via source reblog posted 2 hours ago with 114,024 notes →

peep-toe-shoes:

owlygem:

cchtml:

This feeling when you walk into big art supply stores …

Guuuuhhhh

right now I look like homer simpson staring at doughnuts or donuts or just… food.

via source reblog posted 14 hours ago with 72,759 notes →
jennacolaman:

SAM PEPPERS VIDEO IS OFFICIALLY OFF YOUTUBE!
AND HIS CHANNEL IS SUSPENDED!

jennacolaman:

SAM PEPPERS VIDEO IS OFFICIALLY OFF YOUTUBE!

AND HIS CHANNEL IS SUSPENDED!

via source reblog posted 14 hours ago with 132,509 notes →
homogayhorse:

*presses the button* *worships the button* *becomes the button*

homogayhorse:

*presses the button* *worships the button* *becomes the button*

via source reblog posted 14 hours ago with 12,440 notes →
via source reblog posted 14 hours ago with 3,668 notes →
youtubekilledtv:

It just keeps getting better

youtubekilledtv:

It just keeps getting better

via source reblog posted 14 hours ago with 41,095 notes →
Sam Pepper handcuffs himself to women on the street, refusing to release one woman until she kisses him (x)

aka14kgold:

jean-luc-gohard:

celebreceipts:

In January, Sam Pepper uploaded a video called “How To Get A Girlfriend Easy” in which he sneaks up behind or beside unsuspecting women on the street and handcuffs them to himself. He then tells them they’re “his girlfriend now.”

When one victim reacts furiously, saying “No! I don’t know you! Take it off!” and demands that he remove the handcuffs, he refuses and replies with “We’re dating now.” She tries again, “Look, I don’t know where you’re from, but we don’t do this in America. Take this off,” while fighting with the cuffs. He refuses again, insisting they’re “going on a date.” She then tells him that she’s married, to which he says “No, you’re married to me now,” and refuses yet again to remove the handcuffs.

At the end of the video, another woman is pleading with him to undo the handcuffs, and he refuses to until she kisses him on the lips. Pepper appears to think the entire scenario is hilarious at best and endearingly misguided at worst, while the women being “pranked” are visibly livid, terrified, and profoundly uncomfortable.

NONE OF THESE THINGS ARE PRANKS.

We need to stop calling assault by white men on men of color and women of all races “pranks,” because it makes them seem lighthearted and fun, not like the violent criminal acts they are.

NONE OF THESE THINGS ARE PRANKS.

NONE OF THESE THINGS ARE PRANKS.

NONE OF THESE THINGS ARE PRANKS.

NONE OF THESE THINGS ARE PRANKS.

NONE OF THESE THINGS ARE PRANKS.

NONE OF THESE THINGS ARE PRANKS.

via source reblog posted 14 hours ago with 272,375 notes →
lazysackmuffin:

samapitongzabala:

ceshira:




samapitongzabala:




phoebux:





tetrastructuralmind:





tetrastructuralmind:





fierce





wHY IS THIS GETTING NOTES AGAIN NO





laUGHS AT YOUR PAIN REESE





my hands slipped

it’s transparent btw




…





and we almost forgot his butt


Everybody just STOP whatever you’re doing and look and reblog this

lazysackmuffin:

samapitongzabala:

ceshira:

samapitongzabala:

phoebux:

tetrastructuralmind:

tetrastructuralmind:

fierce

wHY IS THIS GETTING NOTES AGAIN NO

laUGHS AT YOUR PAIN REESE

my hands slipped

image

it’s transparent btw

image

and we almost forgot his butt

image

Everybody just STOP whatever you’re doing and look and reblog this